Multiple perspective assessment to manage free riders in group work

- Gajendran, Thayaparan, Brewer, Graham, Mackee, Jamie, Williams, Tony

Review of the Australian Incident Monitoring System

- Spigelman, Allan David, Swan, Judith

Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general practice registrars

- Fraser, John

Peer review and its contribution to manuscript quality: an Australian perspective

- Lu, Yanping

Quality improvement research: can it be published? (editorial)

- Fahy, Kathleen

Journal peer review: comparing the perceptions and quality judgments of experienced Australian reviewers in education and the physical sciences

- Lu, Yanping

Using nominal group technique to develop a consensus derived model for peer review of teaching across a multi-school faculty

- Burrows, Tracy, Findlay, Naomi, Killen, Chloe, Dempsey, Shane E., Hunter, Sharyn, Chiarelli, Pauline, Snodgrass, Suzanne J.

Access to journals through peer reviewers (Letter)

- McGee, Richard G., Hemsley, Bronwyn, Gill, Peter J.

Learning to be confident and capable journal reviewers: an Australian perspective

- Lu, Yanping

Experienced journal reviewers' perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: an Australian perspective

- Lu, Yanping

The frontiers of artistic research: the challenge of critique, peer review and validation at the outermost limits of location-specificity.

- Lowry, Sean, de Freitas, Nancy

Is peer review in academic publishing still working?

- Jackson, Liz, Peters, Michael A., Locke, Kirsten, Mihaila, Ramona, Stewart, Georgina, Tesar, Marek, Roberts, Peter, Ozoliņš, Jānis John, Benade, Leon, Devine, Nesta, Arndt, Sonja, Forster, Daniella, Gibbons, Andrew, Grierson, Elizabeth, Jandrić, Petar, Lazaroiu, George

How many papers should scientists be reviewing?: An analysis using verified peer review reports

- Raoult, Vincent

Internal coherence matters: Lessons for nutrition and dietetics research

- Palermo, Claire, Reidlinger, Dianne P., Rees, Charlotte E.