- Title
- Where do we intervene to optimize sports systems? Leverage Points the way
- Creator
- Naughton, Mitchell; Salmon, Paul M.; McLean, Scott
- Relation
- Journal of Sports Sciences Vol. 42, Issue 7, p. 566-573
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2352681
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2024
- Description
- Sport and sports research are inherently complex systems. This appears to be somewhat at odds with the current research paradigm in sport in which interventions are aimed are fixing or solving singular broken components within the system. In any complex system, such as sport, there are places where we can intervene to change behaviour and, ideally, system outcomes. Meadows influential work describes 12 different points with which to intervene in complex systems (termed “Leverage Points”), which are ordered from shallow to deeper based on their potential effectiveness to influence transformational change. Whether research in sport is aimed at shallow or deeper Leverage Points is unknown. This study aimed to assess highly impactful research in sports science, sports nutrition/metabolism, sports medicine, sport and exercise psychology, sports management, motor control, sports biomechanics and sports policy/law through a Leverage Points lens. The 10 most highly cited original-research manuscripts from each journal representing these fields were analysed for the Leverage Point with which the intervention described in the manuscript was focused. The results indicate that highly impactful research in sports science, sports nutrition/metabolism, sports biomechanics and sports medicine is predominantly focused at the shallow end of the Leverage Points hierarchy. Conversely, the interventions drawn from journals representing sports management and sports policy/law were focused on the deeper end. Other journals analysed had a mixed profile. Explanations for these findings include the dual practitioner/academic needing to “think fast” to solve immediate questions in sports science/medicine/nutrition, limited engagement with “working slow” systems and method experts and differences in incremental vs. non-incremental research strategies.
- Subject
- systems thinking; meta-science; human factors; sports
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1505720
- Identifier
- uon:55718
- Identifier
- ISSN:0264-0414
- Rights
- X
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 145
- Visitors: 145
- Downloads: 0