- Title
- Communication functions of adult patients admitted to intensive care: A multicentre, binational point prevalence study
- Creator
- Freeman-Sanderson, Amy; Hemsley, Bronwyn; Thompson, Kelly; Rogers, Kris D.; Knowles, Serena; Hammond, Naomi E.
- Relation
- Australian Critical Care Vol. 36, Issue 6, p. 1084-1089
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2023.01.009
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2023
- Description
- Background: Patient communication is profoundly impacted during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. While the impacts of altered communication are recognised, there is a paucity of data on the prevalence of communication attempts as well as modes utilised by patients and unit practices to manage communication function. Objective: The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence and characteristics of observed communication attempts (nonverbal, verbal, and use of the staff call bell) in adult ICU patients and report on unit-level practices on communication management. Methods: A prospective, binational, cross-sectional point-prevalence study was conducted across 44 Australia and New Zealand adult ICUs. Data on communication attempts, modes, ICU-level guidelines, training, and resources were collected in June 2019. Results: Across 44 ICUs, 470 of 623 (75%) participants, including ventilated and nonventilated patients, were attempting to communicate on the study day. Of those invasively ventilated via an endotracheal tube for the entire study day, 42 of 172 (24%) were attempting to communicate and 39 of 45 (87%) patients with a tracheostomy were attempting to communicate. Across the cohort, the primary mode of communication was verbal communication, with 395 of 470 (84%) patients using speech; of those 371 of 395 (94%) spoke English and 24 of 395 (6%) spoke a language other than English. Participants attempting to communicate on the study day had a shorter length of stay (LOS), a mean difference of 3.8 days (95% confidence interval: 0.2; 5.1) shorter LOS in the ICU than those not attempting to communicate, and a mean difference 7.9 days (95% confidence interval: 3.1; 12.6) shorter LOS in hospital overall. Unit-level practices and supports were collected. Six of 44 (14%) ICUs had a protocol for communication management, training was available in 11 of 44 (25%) ICUs, and communication resources were available in 37 of 44 (84%) ICUs. Conclusion: Three-quarters of patients admitted to the ICU were attempting to communicate on the study day, with multiple methods used to support verbal and nonverbal communication regardless of ventilation status. Guidance and training were absent from the majority of ICUs, indicating a need for development and implementation of policies, training, and resources.
- Subject
- artificial airway; communication; communication disability; critical care; tracheostomy
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1499378
- Identifier
- uon:54661
- Identifier
- ISSN:1036-7314
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 555
- Visitors: 555
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|