- Title
- Antiseptic Skin Agents to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Clean Implant Surgery: Subgroup Analysis of the NEWSkin Prep Trial
- Creator
- Smith, Stephen; Abuhassanian, Ibrahim; Attia, John; Carroll, Rosemary; Lott, Natalie; Hampton, Jacob; Gani, Jon
- Relation
- Surgical Infections Vol. 24, Issue 9, p. 818-822
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2023.250
- Publisher
- Mary Ann Liebert
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2023
- Description
- Background: There remains debate as to the ideal skin preparation agent to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after clean implant surgery. This study is a subgroup analysis of all patients undergoing implant surgery in the NEWSkin prep trial. Patients and Methods: The NEWSkin prep trial is a randomized clinical trial (RCT; n = 3300) comparing the three antiseptic skin preparation agents commonly used prior to incisional surgery: chlorhexidine with alcohol (C-Alc), povidone iodine with alcohol (PI-Alc), and aqueous povidone iodine (PI-Aq). All participants who underwent clean incisional surgeries with implants from this trial were selected for analysis. The primary outcome was SSI rate; secondary outcomes were complication rates and re-admission rates. Results: A total of 712 patients in the NEWSkinPrep study underwent clean implant surgery between January 2015 and December 2018. Randomization resulted in the following distribution: C-Alc, 238; PI-Alc, 243; and PI-Aq, 231. Median age of participants was 63 years and 41% were female. Surgical site infection rates were: C-Alc, 10.13%; PI-Alc,11.52%; and PI-Aq, 11.26%. Povidone iodine with alcohol did not appear to be non-inferior to C-Alc (mean difference, 1.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.17 to 6.95) and PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq (mean difference, 0.27%; 95% CI, -5.45 to 5.99; p = 0.9271). There were no differences seen in secondary outcomes between groups. Conclusions: These results indicate a similarity between PI-Alc and C-Alc and that PI-Alc was not superior to PI-Aq. Because this study was not powered to assess these differences in clean cases with implants, additional studies are needed to assess these agents.
- Subject
- antiseptic; clean surgery; implants; surgical site infection
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1495462
- Identifier
- uon:54018
- Identifier
- ISSN:1096-2964
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 576
- Visitors: 563
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|