- Title
- Current use and utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and pancreatic duct stents: A secondary analysis from the Western Trauma Association multicenter trials group on pancreatic injuries
- Creator
- Biffl, Walter L.; Ball, Chad G.; Moore, Ernest E.; West, Michaela; Russo, Rachel; Balogh, Zsolt; Kornblith, Lucy; Castelo, Matthew; WTA Multicenter Trials Group on Pancreatic Injuries,
- Relation
- The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Vol. 95, Issue 5, p. 719-725
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000003990
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2023
- Description
- Introduction: The single most important predictor of pancreas-specific complications (PSCs) after pancreatic trauma is injury to the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Pancreatography has been recommended to evaluate the integrity of the MPD. In addition, pancreatic duct stents have been proposed to prevent or treat PSC. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing MPD injury. We further sought to determine whether stents were effective in preventing PSC or facilitated the resolution of pancreatic leaks or fistulae. Methods: A secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective review of pancreatic injuries in patients 15 years and older from 2010 to 2018, focusing on patients who underwent MRCP or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), was performed. Final pancreatic injury grade was determined based on all available assessments, ultimately adjudicated by the site principal investigator. Data were analyzed using various statistical tests where appropriate. Results: Thirty-three centers reported on 1,243 patients. A total of 216 underwent pancreatography—137 had MRCP and 115 ERCP, with 36 having both. The sensitivity of MRCP for MPD injury was 37%, the specificity was 94%, the positive predictive value was 77%, and the negative predictive value was 73%. When compared with ERCP, MRCP findings were discordant in 64% of cases. Pancreatic stents were placed in 77 patients; 48 (62%) were to treat PSC, with no clear benefit. Twenty-nine had prophylactic stents placed. There did not appear to be benefit in reduced PSC compared with the entire study group or among patients with high-grade pancreatic injuries. Conclusion: The accuracy of MRCP to evaluate the integrity of the MPD does not appear to be superior to computed tomography scan. Consequently, the results of MRCP should be interpreted with caution. The current data do not support prophylactic use of pancreatic stents; they should be studied in a prospective trial. Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
- Subject
- pancreas; pancreatography; MRCP; ERCP; stents
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1492380
- Identifier
- uon:53320
- Identifier
- ISSN:2163-0755
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2150
- Visitors: 2145
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|