Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries

Zanon, Cristian; Brenner, Rachel E.; Topkaya, Nursel; Wade, Nathaniel G.; Zlati, Alina; Baptista, Makilim N.; Vogel, David L.; Rubin, Mark; Al-Darmaki, Fatima R.; Gonçalves, Marta; Heath, Patrick J.; Liao, Hsin-Ya; Mackenzie, Corey S.

Title: Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries
Creator: Zanon, Cristian; Brenner, Rachel E.; Topkaya, Nursel; Wade, Nathaniel G.; Zlati, Alina; Baptista, Makilim N.; Vogel, David L.; Rubin, Mark; Al-Darmaki, Fatima R.; Gonçalves, Marta; Heath, Patrick J.; Liao, Hsin-Ya; Mackenzie, Corey S.
Relation: Assessment Vol. 28, Issue 6, p. 1531-1544
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191119887449
Publisher: Sage
Resource Type: journal article
Date: 2021
Description: This study evaluated the dimensionality, invariance, and reliability of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) within and across Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, Romania, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the United States (N = 2,580) in college student samples. We used confirmatory factor analyses to compare the fit of four different factor structures of the DASS-21: a unidimensional model, a three-correlated-factors model, a higher order model, and a bifactor model. The bifactor model, with three specific factors (depression, anxiety, and stress) and one general factor (general distress), presented the best fit within each country. We also calculated ancillary bifactor indices of model-based dimensionality of the DASS-21 and model-based reliability to further examine the validity of the composite total and subscale scores and the use of unidimensional modeling. Results suggested the DASS-21 can be used as a unidimensional scale. Finally, measurement invariance of the best fitting model was tested across countries indicating configural invariance. The traditional three-correlated-factors model presented scalar invariance across Canada, Hong Kong, Romania, Taiwan, and the United States. Overall, these analyses indicate that the DASS-21 would best be used as a general score of distress rather than three separate factors of depression, anxiety, and stress, in the countries studied.
Subject: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS- 21); bifactor; model-based reliability; measurement invariance; general distress
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1475332
Identifier: uon:49516
Identifier: ISSN:1073-1911
Language: eng
Reviewed

Hits: 1379
Visitors: 1370
Downloads: 0

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format