- Title
- Diet and economic modelling to improve the quality and affordability of the Australian diet for low and medium socioeconomic households
- Creator
- Blumfield, Michelle; Starck, Carlene; Keighley, Tim; Petocz, Peter; Roesler, Anna; Abbott, Kylie; Cassettari, Tim; Marshall, Skye; Fayet-Moore, Flavia
- Relation
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol. 18, Issue 11, no. 5771
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115771
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- Food costs are a barrier to healthier diet selections, particularly for low socioeconomic households who regularly choose processed foods containing refined grains, added sugars, and added fats. In this study, the objectives were to: (i) identify the nutrient density-to-cost ratio of Australian foods; (ii) model the impact of substituting foods with lower nutrient density-to-cost ratio with those with the highest nutrient density-to-cost ratio for diet quality and affordability in low and medium socioeconomic households; and (iii) evaluate food processing levels. Foods were categorized, coded for processing level, analysed for nutrient density and cost, and ranked by nutrient density-to-cost ratio. The top quartile of nutrient dense, low-cost foods included 54% unprocessed (vegetables and reduced fat dairy), 33% ultra-processed (fortified wholegrain bread and breakfast cereals <20 g sugars/100 g), and 13% processed (fruit juice and canned legumes). Using substitution modelling, diet quality improved by 52% for adults and 71% for children across all households, while diet affordability improved by 25% and 27% for low and medium socioeconomic households, respectively. The results indicate that the quality and affordability of the Australian diet can be improved when nutritious, low-cost foods are selected. Processing levels in the healthier modelled diets suggest that some ultra-processed foods may provide a beneficial source of nutrition when consumed within national food group recommendations.
- Subject
- diet; cost analysis; affordability; food security; diet quality; food-processing; SDG 2; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1443278
- Identifier
- uon:41938
- Identifier
- ISSN:1661-7827
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2816
- Visitors: 2814
- Downloads: 0
Collections
Goal 2: Zero Hunger
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|