- Title
- Know your stuff, show enthusiasm, keep it on message: factors influencing video engagement in two mechanical engineering courses
- Creator
- Dart, Sarah; Gregg, Alexander
- Relation
- REES AAEE 2021. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2021) (Perth, WA 05-08 December, 2021)
- Relation
- https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/REES_AAEE_2021_paper_226.pdf
- Publisher
- Engineers Australia
- Resource Type
- conference paper
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- CONTEXT: Video usage in higher education has increased markedly over many years, but ongoing disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have accelerated this trend. Consequently, a growing number of educators are grappling with how to best approach video production. Although a range of factors such as video quality, video length, and the presenters' style are known to influence student engagement with videos, more research is needed to understand the extent to which these factors impact, particularly in higher education. This can support educators producing video content that prioritises those aspects which are most critical. PURPOSE: This research seeks to understand what factors are most influential on students' decisions to engage versus disengage with video resources in the higher education context. This aims to develop a series of recommendations for educators to focus on when producing videos for inclusion in higher engineering education courses. APPROACH: This research considers two mechanical engineering courses taught at different Australian universities. These courses used videos as the primary delivery mode during Semester 2 (July to November) of 2020. Approximately half of each course explicitly applied production recommendations of a highly influential study. Students were surveyed at the end of the semester about their engagement preferences. OUTCOMES: The quality of the presenter's explanations and their enthusiasm in delivery were the most important factors influencing engagement, while seeing the presenter was least important. Video length and quality were more likely to cause disengagement when poor, than drive engagement when done well. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the presenter's delivery (that is the quality of their explanations and their enthusiasm) are more influential in producing engaging video content than technological choices relating to the video capture and length. Therefore, educators should seek to prioritise the quality of their explanations and their stage presence, before working to improve the video/audio capture quality and reducing video durations. Including the face of the instructor in educational videos has little impact on students' usage decisions.
- Subject
- educational videos; student engagement; video production; engineering
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1432722
- Identifier
- uon:39096
- Rights
- Copyright © 2021 Sarah Dart and Alexander Gregg: The authors assign to the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) and educational non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and his copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to REEN and AAEE to publish this document in full on the World Wide Web (prime sites and mirrors), on Memory Sticks, and in printed form within the REEN AAEE 2021 proceedings. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 413
- Visitors: 489
- Downloads: 77
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 434 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |