- Title
- Dialogic consensus in medicine: a justification claim
- Creator
- Walker, Paul; Lovat, Terence
- Relation
- Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Vol. 44, Issue 1, p. 71-84
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy038
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- The historical emphasis of medical ethics, based on substantive frameworks and principles derived from them, is no longer seen as sufficiently sensitive to the moral pluralism characteristic of our current era. We argue that moral decision-making in clinical situations is more properly derived from a process of dialogic consensus. This process entails an inclusive, noncoercive, and self-reflective dialogue within the community affected. In order to justify this approach, we make two claims—the first epistemic, and the second normative. The epistemic claim follows from Habermas’ “ways” of knowing. We argue that the dialogue emanating from this episteme focuses on the relevant facts about the patient, as well as on the values attached to these facts, thus allowing facts and their meanings to serve as the basis for reflective action appropriate to the circumstances. The normative claim follows from Habermas’ discourse theory of morality and communicative action. It determines that clinical decision-making should be approached from the perspective of the actual reality of people in their situation of illness, set in their socio-cultural background, and hence be grounded in the second-person perspective. Relocating ethical decision-making from a monological space into one characterized by dialogue is especially appropriate to the clinical encounter.
- Subject
- dialogic consensus; discourse consensus; Jurgen Habermas; medical ethics; moral pluralism
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1416946
- Identifier
- uon:37139
- Identifier
- ISSN:0360-5310
- Rights
- This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Medicine and Philosophy following peer review. The version of record Paul Walker, Terence Lovat, Dialogic Consensus in Medicine: A Justification Claim, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Volume 44, Issue 1, February 2019, Pages 71–84, is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy038.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 835
- Visitors: 940
- Downloads: 119
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Author final version | 637 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |