- Title
- Comparing the effects of three cognitive tasks on indicators of mental fatigue
- Creator
- Smith, Mitchell R.; Chai, Rifai; Nguyen, Hung T.; Marcora, Samuele M.; Coutts, Aaron J.
- Relation
- Journal of Psychology Vol. 153, Issue 8, p. 759-783
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1611530
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- This investigation assessed the impact of three cognitively demanding tasks on cognitive performance, subjective, and physiological indicators of mental fatigue. Following familiarization, participants completed four testing sessions, separated by 48 h. During each session, participants watched a 45-min emotionally neutral documentary (control) or completed one of the following computer tasks: Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT); AX-Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT); or Stroop Task. Mental fatigue was assessed before and at regular periods for 60 min following the 45-min treatments. Cognitive performance was assessed using 3-min PVT, and task performance. Subjective assessments were conducted using the Brunel Mood Scale, and visual analog scales (VAS). Physiological indicators of mental fatigue included electroencephalography (EEG), and heart rate variability (HRV). Subjective ratings of mental fatigue increased from pre to 0-min post in all-treatments, but not the documentary (p < 0.05). Subjective fatigue (VAS) remained higher (p < 0.05) than pretreatment values for 20-, 50-, and 60-min following the PVT, Stroop, and AX-CPT respectively. The cognitively demanding tasks had unclear effects on 3-min PVT, EEG, and HRV assessments. Tasks requiring response inhibition appear to induce fatigue for longer durations than a simple vigilance task. Simple VAS appear to be the most practical method for assessing mental fatigue.
- Subject
- assessment; neuropsychology; psychophysiology
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1414093
- Identifier
- uon:36702
- Identifier
- ISSN:0022-3980
- Rights
- This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of Psychology on 12/06/2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1611530.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2617
- Visitors: 3601
- Downloads: 1092
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Author final version | 10 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |