- Title
- Agreement between patients’ and radiation oncologists’ cancer diagnosis and prognosis perceptions: a cross sectional study in Japan
- Creator
- Mackenzie, Lisa Jane; Carey, Mariko Leanne; Suzuki, Eiji; Sanson-Fisher, Robert William; Asada, Hiromi; Ogura, Masakazu; D'Este, Catherine; Yoshimura, Michio; Toi, Masakazu
- Relation
- PLoS ONE Vol. 13, Issue 6, no. e0198437
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198437
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2018
- Description
- This study assessed agreement between radiation oncologist- and cancer patient-reported perceptions about cancer diagnosis, time since diagnosis, treatment purpose, and whether life expectancy had been discussed; and described preferences for prognosis discussions. Adult cancer patients receiving radiotherapy at a Japanese hospital were invited to complete a touchscreen tablet survey. Patient survey responses were linked and comparisons made with a survey completed by their radiation oncologist. Among 146 cancer patient-oncologist dyads, there was almost perfect agreement on cancer diagnosis (ĸ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82–0.94), substantial agreement on time since diagnosis (ĸ = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.57–0.83) and moderate agreement on whether treatment goal was curative or palliative (ĸ = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28–0.57; all p’s < 0.0001). Agreement about whether a life expectancy discussion had occurred was less than expected by chance (κ = -0.06, p = 0.9). Radiation oncologists reported that they had spoken to over two thirds of patients about this, whilst less than one third of patients stated that this discussion had occurred with their radiation oncologist. Over half of the patients who had not discussed life expectancy wanted to. Patients had variable preferences for whether they (80%), their radiation oncologist (78%) or their partner/family (52%) should decide whether they discuss their life expectancy. Although patient self-reported information about diagnosis and time since diagnosis appears to be reasonably accurate (compared with clinician-reported information), limitations of self-reported data about prognostic discussions were highlighted by poor agreement between patient- and clinician-reported information about whether prognostic discussions have occurred. Additional support is needed to improve prognosis communication and understanding in radiation oncology settings.
- Subject
- oncology; life expectancy; cancer detection and diagnosis; radiation therapy; cancer treatment; surveys; prognosis; patients
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1389086
- Identifier
- uon:32848
- Identifier
- ISSN:1932-6203
- Rights
- © 2018 Mackenzie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 6053
- Visitors: 6960
- Downloads: 362
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |