- Title
- The pattern of anxiolytic and hypnotic management by Australian general practice trainees
- Creator
- Holliday, Simon M.; Morgan, Simon; Magin, Parker J.; Tapley, Amanda; Henderson, Kim M.; Dunlop, Adrian J.; van Driel, Mieke L.; Spike, Neil A.; McArthur, Lawrence A.; Ball, Jean; Oldmeadow, Christopher J.
- Relation
- Drug and Alcohol Review Vol. 36, Issue 2, p. 261-269
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dar.12404
- Publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2017
- Description
- Introduction and Aims: Guidelines recommend anxiolytics and hypnotics (A/H) as second-line, short-term medications. We aimed to establish prevalence and associations of A/H prescribing by Australian general practice (GP) trainees. Design and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis from a cohort study of vocational trainees from four GP Regional Training Providers during 2010-2013. General practice trainees act as independent practitioners (including for prescribing purposes) while having recourse to advice from a GP supervisor. Practice and trainee demographic data were collected as well as patient, clinical and educational data from 60 consecutive consultations of each trainee each training term. Analysis was at the level of individual problem managed, with the outcome factor being prescription of any anxiolytic or hypnotic. Results: Overall, 645 registrars (response rate 94.0%) prescribed 68 582 medications in 69 621 consultations (with 112 890 problems managed). A/Hs were prescribed for 1.3% of problems managed and comprised 2.2% of all prescriptions. They were prescribed particularly for insomnia (28.2%) or anxiety (21.8%), but also for many 'off-label' indications. Significant associations of A/H prescriptions were: patient-level (greater age, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, English-speaking background, being new to the trainee but not to the practice); trainee-level (male) and consultation-level (longer duration, pre-existing problem, specialist referral not being made). Prescribing was significantly lower in one of the four Regional Training Providers. Discussion and Conclusions: GP trainees, inconsistent with most guideline recommendations, prescribe A/Hs mainly as maintenance therapy to unfamiliar and older patients. Our results suggest that changes in management approaches are needed which may be facilitated by support for psychotherapeutic training.
- Subject
- anti-anxiety agents; drug overdose; family practice; general practitioners; hypnotics and sedatives
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1352316
- Identifier
- uon:30853
- Identifier
- ISSN:0959-5236
- Rights
- This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Holliday, Simon M.; Morgan, Simon; Magin, Parker J.; Tapley, Amanda; Henderson, Kim M.; Dunlop, Adrian J.; van Driel, Mieke L.; Spike, Neil A.; McArthur, Lawrence A.; Ball, Jean; Oldmeadow, Christopher J.; (2017), “The pattern of anxiolytic and hypnotic management by Australian general practice trainees”, Drug and Alcohol Review, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dar.12404. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 4477
- Visitors: 4956
- Downloads: 554
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Author final version | 313 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |