Decision-making in prostate cancer – choosing active surveillance over other treatment options: a literature review

Title: Decision-making in prostate cancer – choosing active surveillance over other treatment options: a literature review
Creator: Bayliss, David R.; Duff, Jed; Stricker, Philip; Walker, Kim
Relation: Urologic Nursing Vol. 37, Issue 1, p. 15-22
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.7257/1053-816X.2017.37.1.15
Publisher: Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates
Resource Type: journal article
Date: 2017
Description: A literature review was done using the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) framework to identify how and why men diagnosed with prostate cancer choose active surveillance over other treatment options. Findings indicated men who choose active surveillance have a stronger preference for active or collaborative decision-making than those who choose other treatments. Men primarily choose active surveillance to avoid the side effects of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. This literature review informed the study by Bayliss, Duff, Stricker, and Walker (2016) and found physician recommendation to be the most influential factor when patients make a treatment decision.
Subject: prostate cancer; active surveillance; prostate cancer treatment; decision-making; literature review; Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1333978
Identifier: uon:27200
Identifier: ISSN:2372-0247
Language: eng
Reviewed

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format