http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/services/Feed ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:11266 The Referential Thinking (REF) scale was designed to be a comprehensive self-report measure of both simple and guilty ideas of reference in the general population. One aim of the present study was to test the proposed interpretations of REF scores by comparing REF scores with ratings of delusions among psychotic patients. A 2nd aim was to test whether REF scores are better predicted by the severity of patients’ delusions of reference (DoRs) than by the severity of their auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), thus supporting the scores’ ability to discriminate between proneness to the 2 different symptoms. The REF scale was completed by 56 healthy controls and 53 acutely psychotic patients. The severity of the patients’ DoRs and AVHs were assessed in structured clinical interviews. REF scores differed significantly not only between the patients and controls but also between patients with versus without DoRs. REF scores correlated significantly with the severity of the patients’ DoRs but not their AVHs. The interpretation of REF scores as a measure of proneness to simple and guilty ideas of reference was supported. 2012-08-14T05:58:37.357Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:10139 The Referential Thinking (REF) scale was designed to be a comprehensive self-report measure of both simple and guilty ideas of reference in the general population. One aim of the present study was to test the proposed interpretations of REF scores by comparing REF scores with ratings of delusions among psychotic patients. A 2nd aim was to test whether REF scores are better predicted by the severity of patients’ delusions of reference (DoRs) than by the severity of their auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), thus supporting the scores’ ability to discriminate between proneness to the 2 different symptoms. The REF scale was completed by 56 healthy controls and 53 acutely psychotic patients. The severity of the patients’ DoRs and AVHs were assessed in structured clinical interviews. REF scores differed significantly not only between the patients and controls but also between patients with versus without DoRs. REF scores correlated significantly with the severity of the patients’ DoRs but not their AVHs. The interpretation of REF scores as a measure of proneness to simple and guilty ideas of reference was supported. 2012-02-22T21:50:04.243Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:6993 Levels of hospital smoking cessation care are less than optimal. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions in increasing smoking cessation care provision in hospitals. A review identified relevant studies published between 1994 and 2006. A description of studies, including methodological quality, was undertaken. Intervention effectiveness in increasing smoking cessation care practices was examined for controlled studies using meta-analysis. Care practices examined were assessment of smoking status; advice to quit; counseling or assistance to quit; advising, offering, or providing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT); and follow-up or referral. Of the 25 identified studies, 18 were U.S. based and in inpatient settings. Of the 10 controlled trials, 4 addressed cardiac patients, 5 measured one smoking cessation care practice, and 9 implemented multistrategic interventions (e.g., combining educational meetings with reminders and written resources). The methodology described in these studies was generally of poor quality. Meta-analysis of controlled trials demonstrated a significant intervention effect for provision of assistance and counseling to quit (pooled risk difference = 16.6, CI = 4.9–28.3) but not for assessment of smoking status, advice to quit, or the provision or discussion of NRT. Statistical heterogeneity was indicated for all smoking cessation care practices. An insufficient number of studies precluded the use of meta-analysis for follow-up or referral for further assistance. Interventions can be effective in increasing the routine provision of hospital smoking cessation care. Future research should use more rigorous study design, examine a broader range of smoking cessation care practices, and focus on hospital-wide intervention implementation. 2012-01-30T05:04:18.959Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:6994 Aims, design and intervention: Smoking care provision to in-patients is important in assisting smoking cessation and for management of nicotine withdrawal. Limited studies have reported the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the hospital-wide provision of such care. A quasi-experimental matched-pair trial, involving two intervention and two control hospitals in NSW, Australia, investigated whether a multi-strategic intervention increased hospital-wide smoking care provision. Participants and measurements: Patient surveys (n = 274-347 per experimental condition), medical notes audits (n = 181-228) and health professional surveys (n = 229-302) were used to collect outcome data at baseline and follow-up. Findings: Significantly greater increases in intervention hospitals compared to control hospitals were found for patient-reported offer of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (intervention 34% versus control 12%), provision of NRT (16% versus 4%) and provision of written resources (11% versus 2%), and for the recording in medical notes of smoking management discussion (13% versus 3%), offer of NRT (24% versus 3%) and provision of NRT (21% versus 5%). Intervention group health professionals reported significantly greater increases in the mean estimate of patients who: had their smoking management discussed (30% versus 17%); were offered or provided with NRT (30% versus 18%); were asked their intention to smoke post-discharge (22% versus 10%); and were provided with discharge NRT (21% versus 4%). Conclusions Implementation of a multi-strategic intervention is effective in increasing hospital smoking care delivery, particularly the provision of NRT. Research is required to identify methods to increase further the delivery of this and other forms of smoking care. 2012-01-30T05:04:18.699Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:7280 Objective: The aim of the present pilot study was to test the feasibility and short-term impact of a multi-component risk factor intervention for reducing (i) coronary heart disease (CHD) risk; (ii) smoking; and (iii) weight among smokers with psychosis. Secondary dependent variables included physical activity, unhealthy eating, substance use, psychiatric symptomatology, treatment retention, general functioning, and quality of life. Method: This was a feasibility study utilizing a pre–post-treatment design with no control group (n=43). All participants provided written informed consent and were assessed before treatment and again a mean of 19.6 weeks later. The treatment consisted of nine individual 1h sessions of motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy plus nicotine replacement therapy, in addition to treatment as usual. Research assistants who had not been involved in the delivery of the treatment programme conducted post-treatment assessments. Results: The intervention was associated with significant reductions in CHD risk scores, smoking and weight. A significant improvement was also reported in level of moderate physical activity, and a small change in the unhealthy eating index was reported. No improvement in biological measures (cholesterol and blood pressure) was evident. Conclusions: A multi-component CHD risk factor intervention among smokers with psychosis appears to be feasible and effective in the short-term. A randomized controlled trial replicating and extending these findings is warranted. 2011-02-23T02:10:06.478Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:1566 Background: The study aimed to (1) determine the current routine smoking care that smoke-free public hospitals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, provide to inpatients who are smokers; (2) determine current strategies supporting such care; and (3) examine the association between smoking care provision and hospital characteristics and support strategies. Method: A cross-sectional survey of 169 senior hospital managers was undertaken. Survey items included smoking care practices such as identification of smoking status and provision of nicotine replacement therapy as well as hospital activities such as existence of policies and staff training. Hospital characteristics such as size and geographic location were also collected. Results: Twenty percent of respondents reported provision of minimally ‘adequate’ smoking care, defined as providing five or more smoking care items to 80% or more of patients. Larger hospitals were significantly less likely to provide adequate smoking care. Nurse training, the existence of signs indicating a smoke-free site and signs indicating location of designated smoking areas were also associated with smoking care provision. The existence of three or more support strategies was associated with smoking care provision. Conclusion: Even in the context of a smoke-free hospital site, the majority of inpatients who are smokers receive inadequate smoking care. Considered investment is required for hospitals to implement strategies to institutionalise the routine provision of appropriate smoking care. 2010-04-27T06:27:56.520Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:4924 Hospitals are key settings for the provision of smoking cessation care. Limited data are available that describe the prevalence and type of such care delivered routinely in this setting. We reviewed studies conducted in hospitals and published between 1994 and 2005 that reported levels of smoking care delivery. This review describes the proportion of patients receiving, and the proportion of health professionals providing, various smoking cessation care practices. We used both descriptive and meta-analytic methods. According to the meta-analysis, smoking status was assessed in 60% of patients, 42% were advised or counseled to quit, 14% were provided with or advised to use nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and 12% received referrals or follow-up. Significantly fewer patients received follow-up or referrals than were assessed for smoking status or received advice or counseling to quit. Some 81% of health professionals reported they assessed smoking status, 70% advised or counseled patients to quit, 13% provided NRT or advised its use, and 39% provided referrals or follow-up. Significantly fewer health professionals advised or prescribed NRT than assessed smoking status or advised or counseled patients to quit. Statistical heterogeneity was indicated for all smoking care practices. Levels of smoking cessation care are less than optimal in hospitals, and the levels of some important care practices are particularly low. Future research should identify effective methods for increasing smoking care provision in this setting. In addition, standardized measures of smoking care should be developed. Hospital organizations should enhance and continue to monitor their delivery of smoking care. 2010-04-27T05:09:23.490Z ]]>