http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/services/Feed ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:219 Previous studies in small groups of patients suggested that immunization of melanoma patients with peptide epitopes recognized by T cells could induce regression of melanoma. This approach was tested in 36 patients with stage IV melanoma. The (MHC class I-restricted) peptides were from gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase, and MAGE-3. The gp100 and MART-1 peptides had been modified to increase their immunogenicity. In half the patients (groups 3 and 4) the peptides were given in the adjuvant Montanide-ISA-720, and half the patients in both groups were given GM-CSF s.c. for 4 days following each injection. Treatment was well tolerated except for two severe erythematous responses to Montanide-ISA-720 and marked inflammatory responses at sites of GM-CSF administration in three patients. There were no objective clinical responses but stabilization of disease for periods from 3 to 12 months were seen in seven patients. Five of these were patients given the peptides in Montanide-ISA-720. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test responses were also seen mainly in the patients given the peptides in Montanide-ISA-720. GM-CSF did not increase DTH responses in patients in the latter group but may have increased DTH responses in those not given peptides in Montanide-ISA-720. Inflammatory responses around s.c. metastases or regional lymph nodes were observed in two patients. These results suggest that the peptides are more effective when given in the adjuvant Montanide-ISA-720. Nevertheless, results from this study, together with those from a number of comparable studies, indicate that peptide vaccines are currently of minimal benefit to patients and support the need for ongoing development of new strategies in treatment of this disease. © Springer-Verlag 2004. 2012-03-12T07:13:33.437Z ]]> http://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:5008 Background: In the present study, we have examined whether treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with matured dendritic cell (DC) vaccines with or without low dose IL-2 may improve treatment outcomes. Methods: Sixteen patients received DC vaccines (DCs) sensitized with autologous melanoma lysates and 18 patients received DCs sensitized with peptides from gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-3.A2, MAGE-A10 and NA17. IL-2 was given subcutaneously (sc) at 1 MU/m² on the second day after each injection for 5-14 days in half of each group. DCs were given by intranodal injection. Results: There were 2 partial responses (PR) and 3 with stable disease (SD) in the nine patients receiving DCs + peptides + IL-2, and 1 PR and 1 SD in nine patients treated with DCs + peptides without IL-2. There were only two patients with SD in the group receiving DCs + autologous lysates and no IL-2. Median overall survival for all patients was very good at 18.5 months but this was most probably due to selection of a favourable group of patients for the study. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups by log rank analysis. Treatment was not associated with significant side effects. The quality and yield of the DCs in the preparations were generally good. Conclusions: We conclude that mature DC preparations may be superior to immature DC preparations for presentation of melanoma peptides and that IL-2 may increase clinical responses to the DCs plus peptides. However, in our view the low response rates do not justify the cost and complexity of this treatment approach. 2012-03-12T06:48:17.713Z ]]>