Crossing divides: an argument catalogue of submissions to the 2000 Australian Government inquiry into the education of boys | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository

Home

Description	Size	Format
Publisher version (open access)	106 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	View/Open

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/920607

Title: Crossing divides: an argument catalogue of submissions to the 2000 Australian Government inquiry into the education of boys
Author/Creator: Hartman, Deborah
Description: This article describes a study of a sample of submissions to an Australian government Inquiry into the Education of Boys, using a relatively new methodology for reviewing literature, called an argument catalogue. The study examines the usefulness of the methodology to an analysis of the complex field of boys’ education. The author argues that the argument catalogue approach offers a way of including and analysing all voices within the field, particularly the previously under-represented views of parents and practitioners and that despite complexities, there are commonalities that can be built on, which are critical to any positive change in this field.
Relation: Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies Vol. 5, Issue 1, p. 81-98
Publisher Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3149/thy.0501.81
Date: 2011
Publisher: Men's Studies Press
Keyword(s): boys’ education; gender policy in schools; argument catalogue; literature review methodology
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/920607
Identifier: ISSN:1931-9045
Language: eng

48 Visitors

56 Hits

NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository